Department of Labor Logo United States Department of Labor
Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

News Release Information

15-1227-CHI
Monday, July 20, 2015

Contacts Technical information: Media contact:
  • (312) 353-1138

County Employment and Wages in Nebraska — Fourth Quarter 2014

The two largest counties in Nebraska reported employment gains from December 2013 to December 2014, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported today. (Large counties are defined as those with employment of 75,000 or more as measured by 2013 annual average employment.) Regional Commissioner Charlene Peiffer noted that employment rose 1.7 percent in Douglas County and 0.8 percent in Lancaster County. (See table 1.)

Nationally, employment advanced 2.2 percent from December 2013 to December 2014 as 319 of the 339 largest U.S. counties registered increases. Weld, Colo., and Midland, Texas, had the largest percentage increases, with gains of 8.0 percent each over the year. Atlantic, N.J., had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment, with a loss of 5.0 percent.

Among the two largest counties in Nebraska, employment was higher in Douglas (332,400) in December 2014. Lancaster County recorded an employment level of 164,900. Collectively, Nebraska’s two large counties accounted for 51.9 percent of the state's employment. Nationwide, the 339 largest counties made up 72.1 percent of total U.S. employment.

The average weekly wage in Douglas was $932 in the fourth quarter of 2014, an increase of 4.7 percent from the fourth quarter of 2013. (See table 1.) Average weekly wages in Lancaster were $819, up 3.8 percent over the year. Nationally, the average weekly wage was $1,035, up 3.5 percent from a year ago.

Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 91 counties in Nebraska with employment levels below 75,000. With the exceptions of Blaine County ($1,131) and Stanton County ($1,148), wage levels in all of these smaller counties were below the national average in the fourth quarter of 2014. (See table 2.)

Large county wage changes

As noted, average weekly wages in Douglas County increased 4.7 percent, ranking it 60th among the nation's 339 largest counties. Lancaster County’s 3.8-percent wage gain ranked 133rd nationwide. (See table 1.)

Nationally, 332 of the 339 largest counties registered over-the-year increases in average weekly wages. Benton, Ark., had the largest wage gain, up 9.9 percent from the fourth quarter of 2013. Washington, Pa., was second with a wage increase of 9.2 percent, followed by the counties of Midland, Texas (9.0 percent), Brazoria, Texas (8.9 percent), and Douglas, Colo. (8.8 percent).

Of the 339 largest U.S. counties, 7 experienced over-the-year decreases in average weekly wages. San Mateo, Calif., had the largest percentage decrease in average weekly wages, with a loss of 20.4 percent from the fourth quarter 2013. Olmsted, Minn., had the second largest percentage decrease with a loss of 5.5 percent, followed by Morris, N.J. (-2.9 percent); Rockland, N.Y. (-1.3 percent); and Camden, N.J., and Butler, Pa. (-0.8 percent each).

Large county average weekly wages

Douglas County’s $932 average weekly wage placed near the middle of the national ranking at 181st in the fourth quarter of 2014. Lancaster County’s average weekly wage of $819 ranked 285th among the nation’s largest counties.

Nationally, 95 large counties registered average weekly wages above the U.S. average of $1,035 in the fourth quarter of 2014. San Mateo, Calif., held the top position with an average weekly wage of $2,166. New York, N.Y., was second at $2,138, followed by Santa Clara, Calif. ($2,114), Suffolk Mass. ($1,856), and San Francisco, Calif. ($1,850).

Seventy-two percent of the largest U.S. counties (244) reported weekly wages below the national average. Horry County, S.C., reported the lowest wage ($610), followed by the Texas counties of Cameron ($621) and Hidalgo ($641), and the Florida counties of Osceola ($687) and Lake ($691).

Average weekly wages in Nebraska’s smaller counties

Among the counties with employment below 75,000, Stanton ($1,148), Blaine ($1,131), Nemaha ($990), and Washington ($957) had average weekly wages above those of the state’s two largest counties. Loup County reported the lowest weekly wage in the state, averaging $414 in the fourth quarter of 2014. (See table 2.)

When all 93 counties in the state were considered, 17 reported average weekly wages less than $600, 31 reported wages from $600 to $699, 31 reported wages from $700 to $799, and 14 had wages of $800 or more. (See chart 1.)

Additional statistics and other information

QCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.

Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2013 edition of this publication contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2014 version of the national news release. Tables and additional content from Employment and Wages Annual Averages 2013 are now available online at www.bls.gov/cew/cewbultn13.htm. The 2014 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available in September 2015.

The County Employment and Wages release for first quarter 2015 is scheduled to be released on Thursday, September 17, 2015.


Technical Note

Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The 9.5 million employer reports cover 139.2 million full- and part-time workers. The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.

QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.

The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.

Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.

Table 1. Covered employment and wages in the United States and the 2 largest counties in Nebraska, fourth quarter 2014
AreaEmploymentAverage weekly wage (1)
December 2014 (thousands)Percent change, December 2013-14 (2)National ranking by percent change (3)Average weekly wageNational ranking by level (3)Percent change, fourth quarter 2013-14 (2)National ranking by percent change (3)

United States (4)

139,204.82.2--$1,035--3.5--

Nebraska

958.11.4--837425.23

Douglas, Neb.

332.41.71839321814.760

Lancaster, Neb.

164.90.82648192853.8133

Footnotes:
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Percent changes were computed from quarterly employment and pay data adjusted for noneconomic county reclassifications.
(3) Ranking does not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(4) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
 

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
 

Table 2. Covered employment and wages in the United States and all counties in Nebraska, fourth quarter 2014
AreaEmployment December 2014Average weekly wage (1)

United States (2)

139,204,840$1,035

Nebraska

958,100837

Adams

15,134747

Antelope

2,099702

Arthur

84455

Banner

163734

Blaine

1361,131

Boone

2,363674

Box Butte

3,941692

Boyd

574526

Brown

1,235651

Buffalo

27,182727

Burt

1,867729

Butler

2,711753

Cass

5,414701

Cedar

2,783687

Chase

1,835738

Cherry

2,250606

Cheyenne

5,650880

Clay

2,555809

Colfax

5,046708

Cuming

3,919751

Custer

4,229797

Dakota

12,337810

Dawes

3,336588

Dawson

11,642701

Deuel

580602

Dixon

1,737631

Dodge

17,114700

Douglas

332,436932

Dundy

627742

Fillmore

2,263740

Franklin

805659

Frontier

748663

Furnas

2,020666

Gage

9,021693

Garden

555581

Garfield

851603

Gosper

405700

Grant

271667

Greeley

646577

Hall

35,017724

Hamilton

3,408797

Harlan

835586

Hayes

214571

Hitchcock

673692

Holt

4,601718

Hooker

270506

Howard

1,538615

Jefferson

3,377651

Johnson

1,690668

Kearney

2,270728

Keith

3,381621

Keya Paha

160561

Kimball

1,633816

Knox

2,937579

Lancaster

164,945819

Lincoln

14,764726

Logan

201552

Loup

119414

Madison

21,865754

McPherson

70541

Merrick

2,477778

Morrill

1,536713

Nance

1,141643

Nemaha

3,211990

Nuckolls

1,413574

Otoe

6,189676

Pawnee

866648

Perkins

1,161794

Phelps

4,856824

Pierce

2,049708

Platte

18,831788

Polk

1,490697

Red Willow

5,398673

Richardson

2,451619

Rock

450651

Saline

6,938773

Sarpy

67,322838

Saunders

5,177672

Scotts Bluff

16,901741

Seward

6,155779

Sheridan

1,764563

Sherman

824537

Sioux

173601

Stanton

1,3611,148

Thayer

2,484820

Thomas

260616

Thurston

2,957814

Valley

1,778662

Washington

8,169957

Wayne

4,113635

Webster

1,056583

Wheeler

328664

York

7,548763

Footnotes
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
 

NOTE: Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
Data are preliminary.
 

Table 3. Covered employment and wages by state, fourth quarter 2014
StateEmploymentAverage weekly wage (1)
December 2014 (thousands)Percent change, December 2013-14Average weekly wageNational ranking by levelPercent change, fourth quarter 2013-14National ranking by percent change

United States (2)

139,204.82.2$1,035--3.5--

Alabama

1,891.41.3881353.531

Alaska

317.60.81,063134.020

Arizona

2,630.82.2926252.347

Arkansas

1,180.52.2807474.55

California

16,068.52.61,20962.941

Colorado

2,478.03.91,066124.117

Connecticut

1,681.21.21,27842.745

Delaware

433.02.91,049161.551

District of Columbia

736.90.91,69613.728

Florida

8,009.63.5911283.140

Georgia

4,131.93.7958213.825

Hawaii

638.30.7908294.215

Idaho

650.72.5782504.020

Illinois

5,844.11.41,08982.842

Indiana

2,946.51.7846413.922

Iowa

1,527.61.1870384.311

Kansas

1,377.21.3855392.646

Kentucky

1,852.21.8836434.117

Louisiana

1,954.02.1923263.825

Maine

592.70.9826445.14

Maryland

2,590.31.31,11373.531

Massachusetts

3,415.62.21,31534.55

Michigan

4,158.92.1984203.337

Minnesota

2,762.91.41,024173.630

Mississippi

1,118.61.0747512.347

Missouri

2,709.81.5891323.434

Montana

442.20.5794484.55

Nebraska

958.11.4837425.23

Nevada

1,229.64.2899301.650

New Hampshire

638.01.41,081106.32

New Jersey

3,933.61.31,21152.049

New Mexico

808.41.3850404.410

New York

9,067.62.01,32124.311

North Carolina

4,141.82.4890333.434

North Dakota

454.84.51,050157.11

Ohio

5,264.31.6922273.922

Oklahoma

1,614.32.1876362.842

Oregon

1,755.43.2928233.825

Pennsylvania

5,716.51.21,013183.728

Rhode Island

471.51.91,003194.55

South Carolina

1,931.42.9817463.239

South Dakota

412.51.3791494.215

Tennessee

2,822.12.4927243.531

Texas

11,662.73.71,070114.311

Utah

1,324.23.0872374.311

Vermont

311.00.7882344.117

Virginia

3,691.40.61,057142.842

Washington

3,069.73.21,08294.55

West Virginia

712.00.1818453.337

Wisconsin

2,789.31.3894313.434

Wyoming

283.61.5952223.922

Puerto Rico

944.2-1.5556(3)0.7(3)

Virgin Islands

38.5-0.3746(3)-1.2(3)

Footnotes:
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(3) Data not included in the national ranking.
 

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
 

 

Last Modified Date: Monday, July 20, 2015