Department of Labor Logo United States Department of Labor
Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

News Release Information

22-1957-ATL
Wednesday, October 05, 2022

Contacts Technical information: Media contact:
  • (404) 893-4220

County Employment and Wages in Tennessee — First Quarter 2022

Employment rose in all of Tennessee’s six large counties from March 2021 to March 2022, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are those with annual average employment levels of 75,000 or more in 2021.) Regional Commissioner Janet S. Rankin noted that Davidson County had the largest over-the-year increase in employment at 7.8 percent. (See chart 1 and table 1.)


National employment increased 5.0 percent over the year, with 349 of the 355 largest U.S. counties reporting gains. Clark, NV, had the largest over-the-year increase in employment with a gain of 12.5 percent. Jefferson, LA, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment with a loss of 0.8 percent.

Among the six largest counties in Tennessee, employment was highest in Davidson County (520,900) in March 2022. Within Davidson County’s private industry, health care and social assistance accounted for the largest employment. Together, the six largest Tennessee counties accounted for 56 percent of total employment within the state. Nationwide, the 355 largest counties made up 73 percent of total U.S. employment.

Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 89 counties in Tennessee with employment below 75,000. Wage levels in 88 of the 89 smaller counties were below the national average of $1,374 in the first quarter of 2022. (See table 2.)

Large county wage changes

All six large Tennessee counties reported average weekly wage gains from the first quarter of 2021 to the first quarter of 2022. (See chart 2.) Four counties had rates of wage gains that were above the national rate of 6.7 percent. Williamson County had the largest gain (+9.7 percent), followed by Hamilton County (+9.0 percent).


Among the 355 largest counties in the United States, 348 had over-the-year wage increases. Peoria, IL, had the largest percentage wage increase (+25.8 percent). San Francisco, CA, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease (-9.1 percent).

Large county average weekly wages

Among Tennessee’s six largest counties, Williamson ($1,727) and Davidson ($1,496) had an average weekly wage above the national average of $1,374 in the first quarter of 2022.

Among the largest U.S. counties, 87 reported average weekly wages above the U.S. average in the first quarter of 2022. New York, NY, had the highest average weekly wage at $4,064. Average weekly wages were below the national average in the remaining 268 counties. At $736 a week, Cameron, TX, had the lowest average weekly wage.

Average weekly wages in Tennessee’s smaller counties

Among the 89 smaller counties in Tennessee—those with employment below 75,000—Roane ($1,385) reported an average weekly wage above the national average of $1,374. Hancock County ($571) reported the lowest average weekly wage in the state.

When all 95 counties in Tennessee were considered, 11 reported average weekly wages of less than $700, 24 had wages from $700 to $799, 29 had wages from $800 to $899, 15 had wages from $900 to $999, and 16 had average weekly wages of $1,000 or higher. (See chart 3.)

Additional statistics and other information

QCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.

Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. This publication is typically published in September of the following year of the reference period or shortly after the QCEW first quarter full data update. The Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online is available at www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/.

The County Employment and Wages release for second quarter 2022 is scheduled to be released on Tuesday, November 22, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. (ET). The County Employment and Wages full data update for second quarter 2022 is scheduled to be released on Tuesday, December 6, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. (ET).

Changes to QCEW with First Quarter 2022 Release

County Changes for the 2022 County Employment and Wages News Releases

Counties with annual average employment of 75,000 or more in 2021 are included in this release and will be included in future 2022 releases. Nationally, twelve counties have been added to the publication tables. No counties were dropped from the publication tables.

Industry Changes to QCEW Data

Beginning with the full release of first quarter 2022 data on September 7, 2022, the QCEW program began use of the 2022 version of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) as the basis for the publication of economic data by industry. For information on the use of the 2022 version of NAICS in QCEW, please see www.bls.gov/cew/classifications/industry/naics-2022.htm.


Technical Note

Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS web site at www.bls.gov/cew. However, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s web site.

QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.

The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.

Information in this release will be made available to individuals with sensory impairments upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Telecommunications Relay Service: 7-1-1.

Table 1. Covered establishments, employment, and wages in the United States and the six largest counties in Tennessee, first quarter 2022
Area Establishments,
first quarter
(thousands)
Employment Average weekly wage (1)
March 2022
(thousands)
Percent change,
March
2021–22 (2)
National ranking
by percent change (3)
First quarter
2022
National ranking
by level (3)
Percent change,
first quarter
2021–22 (2)
National ranking
by percent change (3)

United States (4)

11,299.0 147,648.4 5.0 -- $1,374 -- 6.7 --

Tennessee

198.1 3,104.1 4.6 -- 1,172 26 8.8 11

Davidson

30.6 520.9 7.8 18 1,496 56 8.4 94

Hamilton

12.1 206.1 3.2 218 1,164 181 9.0 73

Knox

15.4 242.2 2.9 243 1,100 222 4.6 277

Rutherford

7.5 138.5 4.2 148 1,032 272 6.8 181

Shelby

23.5 488.5 2.6 267 1,259 131 6.6 197

Williamson

12.5 145.3 6.3 48 1,727 27 9.7 47

Footnotes:
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Percent changes were computed from employment and pay data adjusted for noneconomic county reclassifications.
(3) Ranking does not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(4) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.

Table 2. Covered establishments, employment, and wages in the United States and all counties in Tennessee, first quarter 2022
Area Establishments Employment March 2022 Average weekly wage (1)

United States (2)

11,299,030 147,648,359 $1,374

Tennessee

198,090 3,104,060 1,172

Anderson

1,898 44,011 1,314

Bedford

996 17,111 870

Benton

342 4,284 768

Bledsoe

174 2,039 828

Blount

3,025 52,307 1,094

Bradley

2,193 43,199 928

Campbell

694 8,951 741

Cannon

261 2,377 795

Carroll

524 6,861 715

Carter

820 11,865 770

Cheatham

854 9,252 1,003

Chester

309 4,064 690

Claiborne

558 9,203 792

Clay

150 1,383 645

Cocke

557 7,385 773

Coffee

1,484 25,747 957

Crockett

286 3,710 928

Cumberland

1,361 17,817 760

Davidson

30,600 520,902 1,496

Decatur

265 3,318 777

De Kalb

406 5,882 808

Dickson

1,292 18,260 831

Dyer

880 15,737 925

Fayette

708 8,022 967

Fentress

350 5,388 654

Franklin

942 11,332 840

Gibson

1,051 14,110 796

Giles

672 10,194 816

Grainger

345 4,119 901

Greene

1,449 24,764 838

Grundy

224 2,112 610

Hamblen

1,457 32,542 839

Hamilton

12,091 206,073 1,164

Hancock

100 1,020 571

Hardeman

400 6,005 857

Hardin

598 7,985 966

Hawkins

804 12,155 872

Haywood

341 5,064 918

Henderson

563 7,622 812

Henry

769 11,083 790

Hickman

363 4,124 855

Houston

133 1,372 687

Humphreys

397 5,569 1,045

Jackson

177 1,529 713

Jefferson

897 13,746 886

Johnson

338 4,105 841

Knox

15,435 242,243 1,100

Lake

108 1,477 793

Lauderdale

366 6,484 801

Lawrence

832 11,581 777

Lewis

245 3,099 667

Lincoln

721 9,677 821

Loudon

1,267 17,562 960

McMinn

1,049 18,039 884

McNairy

503 5,257 719

Macon

377 5,082 760

Madison

2,727 59,011 997

Marion

517 7,908 818

Marshall

665 9,603 908

Maury

2,623 37,739 1,089

Meigs

144 2,356 863

Monroe

846 15,258 857

Montgomery

4,101 59,467 852

Moore

90 2,457 1,016

Morgan

233 3,225 782

Obion

728 11,559 811

Overton

428 5,242 748

Perry

147 1,517 660

Pickett

120 908 633

Polk

286 2,275 734

Putnam

2,283 38,790 839

Rhea

565 12,388 1,029

Roane

912 19,293 1,385

Robertson

1,462 22,305 886

Rutherford

7,450 138,535 1,032

Scott

372 5,585 667

Sequatchie

266 3,325 686

Sevier

3,279 48,983 709

Shelby

23,521 488,518 1,259

Smith

378 5,063 894

Stewart

243 2,755 1,055

Sullivan

3,925 67,837 1,191

Sumner

4,858 58,467 998

Tipton

887 12,310 840

Trousdale

152 1,892 880

Unicoi

302 4,917 985

Union

285 2,686 833

Van Buren

79 834 706

Warren

920 12,189 827

Washington

3,557 63,566 925

Wayne

279 3,911 780

Weakley

622 10,951 759

White

533 7,211 783

Williamson

12,471 145,283 1,727

Wilson

3,962 60,140 924

Footnotes:
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.

Table 3. Covered establishments, employment, and wages by state, first quarter 2022
State Establishments,
first quarter
(thousands)
Employment Average weekly wage (1)
March 2022
(thousands)
Percent change,
March
2021–22
First quarter
2022
National ranking
by level
Percent change,
first quarter
2021–22
National ranking
by percent change

United States (2)

11,299.0 147,648.4 5.0 $1,374 -- 6.7 --

Alabama

143.7 1,990.4 2.5 1,072 39 8.2 21

Alaska

24.2 303.9 2.8 1,178 25 4.9 45

Arizona

195.8 3,048.2 5.0 1,234 21 7.5 29

Arkansas

98.3 1,232.7 3.1 1,060 40 10.9 2

California

1,667.6 17,720.8 7.7 1,644 5 1.0 51

Colorado

238.0 2,767.9 5.1 1,455 9 8.8 11

Connecticut

135.7 1,618.6 4.3 1,716 4 9.2 6

Delaware

38.1 447.8 3.9 1,362 14 7.5 29

District of Columbia

46.9 749.1 5.8 2,221 1 2.6 49

Florida

844.0 9,249.2 6.1 1,222 23 10.8 3

Georgia

359.6 4,615.2 5.0 1,301 17 8.8 11

Hawaii

50.4 612.1 7.9 1,135 30 4.2 47

Idaho

83.6 806.4 4.7 982 49 8.5 18

Illinois

403.8 5,808.8 4.5 1,487 8 7.3 33

Indiana

183.0 3,071.1 3.7 1,127 32 9.8 5

Iowa

108.2 1,511.6 2.5 1,080 36 7.6 27

Kansas

93.1 1,369.8 2.5 1,073 38 9.0 10

Kentucky

137.5 1,911.5 4.0 1,038 44 7.6 27

Louisiana

147.6 1,820.6 1.3 1,058 42 8.6 16

Maine

60.4 604.1 2.8 1,103 35 10.3 4

Maryland

179.9 2,623.1 3.9 1,410 10 2.0 50

Massachusetts

286.6 3,516.0 5.3 1,827 3 5.9 43

Michigan

282.2 4,212.5 4.6 1,225 22 6.2 41

Minnesota

194.1 2,772.6 2.7 1,374 11 6.8 37

Mississippi

77.9 1,134.2 2.9 879 51 8.5 18

Missouri

227.1 2,788.2 3.0 1,128 31 7.0 34

Montana

57.5 479.9 3.1 991 48 8.3 20

Nebraska

78.7 965.4 1.5 1,079 37 9.2 6

Nevada

102.7 1,441.3 11.6 1,164 27 8.0 23

New Hampshire

61.1 659.9 4.3 1,361 15 7.8 25

New Jersey

317.9 4,085.1 7.2 1,606 6 4.6 46

New Mexico

68.0 817.4 5.1 1,018 45 6.5 40

New York

681.3 9,107.2 6.0 1,972 2 5.6 44

North Carolina

335.8 4,638.3 4.8 1,241 20 9.2 6

North Dakota

33.3 400.5 2.7 1,106 34 6.9 35

Ohio

320.5 5,299.0 3.1 1,179 24 7.5 29

Oklahoma

120.7 1,601.8 2.9 1,012 46 8.0 23

Oregon

175.1 1,921.9 4.0 1,259 18 7.4 32

Pennsylvania

384.0 5,778.2 4.3 1,309 16 6.9 35

Rhode Island

45.0 469.3 4.7 1,249 19 6.8 37

South Carolina

164.1 2,142.9 3.9 1,043 43 9.2 6

South Dakota

37.8 432.0 3.5 1,012 46 8.6 16

Tennessee

198.1 3,104.1 4.6 1,172 26 8.8 11

Texas

788.4 12,985.4 6.1 1,369 12 8.7 14

Utah

126.5 1,625.6 4.5 1,152 28 8.2 21

Vermont

29.3 295.8 3.9 1,107 33 7.7 26

Virginia

310.8 3,889.4 3.1 1,366 13 6.6 39

Washington

277.3 3,453.4 6.0 1,596 7 3.8 48

West Virginia

55.2 668.1 2.9 968 50 6.1 42

Wisconsin

193.9 2,816.5 2.9 1,137 29 8.7 14

Wyoming

28.9 263.6 2.6 1,059 41 11.2 1

Puerto Rico

48.7 917.1 6.8 579 (3) 2.8 (3)

Virgin Islands

3.5 34.8 -0.3 947 (3) -3.7 (3)

Footnotes:
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(3) Data not included in the national ranking.

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.


 

Last Modified Date: Wednesday, October 05, 2022