An official website of the United States government
22-2322-DAL
Friday, December 16, 2022
Employment rose in all three of the largest counties in Oklahoma from June 2021 to June 2022, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are those with annual average employment levels of 75,000 or more in 2021.) Regional Commissioner Michael Hirniak noted that Oklahoma County had the largest over-the-year increase in employment (+3.7 percent). (See chart 1 and table 1.)
National employment increased 4.0 percent over the year, with 338 of the 355 largest U.S. counties reporting gains. Orange, FL, had the largest over-the-year increase in employment with a gain of 9.7 percent. Kanawha, WV, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment with a loss of 1.0 percent.
Among the three largest counties in Oklahoma, employment was highest in Oklahoma County (468,200) in June 2022. Within Oklahoma County’s private industry, health care and social assistance accounted for the largest employment. Together, the three largest Oklahoma counties accounted for 56.6 percent of total employment within the state. Nationwide, the 355 largest counties made up 72.8 percent of total U.S. employment.
Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 74 counties in Oklahoma with employment below 75,000. Wage levels in all 74 smaller counties were below the national average of $1,294 in the second quarter of 2022. (See table 2.)
Large county wage changesAll three large Oklahoma counties reported average weekly wage gains from the second quarter of 2021 to the second quarter of 2022. (See chart 2.) Two counties had rates of wage gains at or above the national rate of 4.3 percent: Cleveland (+4.9 percent) and Oklahoma (+4.3 percent). Tulsa County’s reported rate of wage gain was 3.8 percent.
Among the 355 largest counties in the United States, 340 had over-the-year wage increases. Saratoga, NY, had the largest percentage wage increase (+16.3 percent). Benton, AR, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease (-16.1 percent).
Large county average weekly wagesWeekly wages in the three largest counties in Oklahoma were below the national average of $1,294 in the second quarter of 2022. Average weekly wages in Oklahoma County ($1,131) and Tulsa County ($1,081) ranked 201st and 236th, respectively, in the middle third of the large county national rankings. The average weekly wage for Cleveland County ($912) ranked 342nd among the 355 largest U.S. counties.
Among the largest U.S. counties, 91 reported average weekly wages above the U.S. average in the second quarter of 2022. Santa Clara, CA, had the highest average weekly wage at $3,262. Average weekly wages were at or below the national average in the remaining 264 counties. At $767 a week, Hidalgo, TX, had the lowest average weekly wage.
Average weekly wages in Oklahoma's smaller countiesAll 74 smaller counties in Oklahoma—those with employment below 75,000—reported an average weekly wage below the national average. Dewey County reported the highest average weekly wage, $1,175. McIntosh County reported the lowest average wage in the state at $675 per week.
When all 77 counties in Oklahoma were considered, 20 reported average weekly wages of $799 or less, 25 registered wages from $800 to $899, 26 had wages from $900 to $999, and 6 had average weekly wages of $1,000 or higher. (See chart 3.) Most of the highest paying counties were in and around the Oklahoma City and Tulsa metropolitan areas.
Additional statistics and other informationQCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.
Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. This publication is typically published in September of the following year of the reference period or shortly after the QCEW first quarter full data update. The Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online is available at www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/.
The County Employment and Wages release for third quarter 2022 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, February 22, 2023.
The County Employment and Wages full data update for third quarter 2022 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, March 8, 2023.
With the Second Quarter 2022 QCEW data released December 6th, 2022, state and local government employment and wage measures include data for some states that were previously suppressed for confidentiality reasons. Publication of these data is possible because state and local government employment and wages are fully disclosable by law in many states. The improved data account for an employment of about 4.2 million in June 2022. Suppressed data were always included in totals and do not represent an increase in employment.
More information is available on the website about the improved usability of state and local government data.
Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS web site at www.bls.gov/cew. However, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s web site.
QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.
The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.
Information in this release will be made available to individuals with sensory impairments upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Telecommunications Relay Service: 7-1-1.
Area | Establishments, second quarter (thousands) |
Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 2022 (thousands) |
Percent change, June 2021–22 (2) |
National ranking by percent change (3) |
Second quarter 2022 |
National ranking by level (3) |
Percent change, second quarter 2021–22 (2) |
National ranking by percent change (3) |
||
United States (4) |
11,460.8 | 149,902.0 | 4.0 | -- | $1,294 | -- | 4.3 | -- |
Oklahoma |
121.9 | 1,610.4 | 2.5 | -- | 1,016 | 46 | 5.4 | 26 |
Cleveland |
6.7 | 86.5 | 0.4 | 333 | 912 | 342 | 4.9 | 156 |
Oklahoma |
30.8 | 468.2 | 3.7 | 112 | 1,131 | 201 | 4.3 | 200 |
Tulsa |
24.6 | 356.6 | 1.6 | 279 | 1,081 | 236 | 3.8 | 235 |
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data. |
||||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Area | Establishments | Employment June 2022 | Average weekly wage (1) |
---|---|---|---|
United States (2) |
11,460,819 | 149,901,995 | $1,294 |
Oklahoma |
121,907 | 1,610,380 | 1,016 |
Adair |
331 | 4,476 | 779 |
Alfalfa |
150 | 1,259 | 913 |
Atoka |
320 | 3,229 | 748 |
Beaver |
170 | 1,250 | 854 |
Beckham |
797 | 9,254 | 921 |
Blaine |
300 | 2,936 | 858 |
Bryan |
1,145 | 20,166 | 951 |
Caddo |
616 | 7,024 | 906 |
Canadian |
3,592 | 35,371 | 917 |
Carter |
1,782 | 22,819 | 940 |
Cherokee |
864 | 16,460 | 864 |
Choctaw |
374 | 4,426 | 775 |
Cimarron |
102 | 835 | 677 |
Cleveland |
6,721 | 86,474 | 912 |
Coal |
122 | 1,110 | 752 |
Comanche |
2,523 | 40,200 | 903 |
Cotton |
112 | 1,584 | 838 |
Craig |
423 | 5,054 | 802 |
Creek |
1,649 | 19,405 | 973 |
Custer |
996 | 12,018 | 864 |
Delaware |
890 | 9,930 | 766 |
Dewey |
201 | 1,862 | 1,175 |
Ellis |
137 | 1,072 | 838 |
Garfield |
1,741 | 23,134 | 941 |
Garvin |
826 | 9,809 | 1,004 |
Grady |
1,210 | 12,008 | 874 |
Grant |
168 | 1,332 | 982 |
Greer |
108 | 828 | 746 |
Harmon |
76 | 637 | 745 |
Harper |
145 | 1,004 | 787 |
Haskell |
257 | 3,273 | 750 |
Hughes |
282 | 2,700 | 740 |
Jackson |
655 | 9,267 | 944 |
Jefferson |
142 | 1,006 | 699 |
Johnston |
249 | 2,719 | 849 |
Kay |
1,230 | 17,418 | 889 |
Kingfisher |
590 | 6,587 | 1,012 |
Kiowa |
237 | 1,909 | 796 |
Latimer |
222 | 2,423 | 822 |
LeFlore |
1,002 | 11,886 | 865 |
Lincoln |
712 | 6,865 | 903 |
Logan |
834 | 8,012 | 817 |
Love |
239 | 5,185 | 833 |
McClain |
1,164 | 10,313 | 828 |
McCurtain |
811 | 12,190 | 806 |
McIntosh |
406 | 4,262 | 675 |
Major |
258 | 2,150 | 807 |
Marshall |
316 | 4,913 | 972 |
Mayes |
972 | 12,892 | 975 |
Murray |
371 | 5,416 | 794 |
Muskogee |
1,554 | 28,535 | 942 |
Noble |
261 | 4,784 | 910 |
Nowata |
175 | 1,888 | 909 |
Okfuskee |
224 | 2,261 | 740 |
Oklahoma |
30,786 | 468,177 | 1,131 |
Okmulgee |
793 | 9,279 | 875 |
Osage |
561 | 6,769 | 882 |
Ottawa |
762 | 12,866 | 791 |
Pawnee |
322 | 3,165 | 838 |
Payne |
2,159 | 32,818 | 907 |
Pittsburg |
1,039 | 14,705 | 959 |
Pontotoc |
1,173 | 19,142 | 942 |
Pottawatomie |
1,424 | 22,281 | 840 |
Pushmataha |
278 | 2,321 | 786 |
Roger Mills |
106 | 818 | 884 |
Rogers |
2,079 | 26,118 | 994 |
Seminole |
528 | 6,607 | 863 |
Sequoyah |
733 | 9,446 | 681 |
Stephens |
1,142 | 14,842 | 921 |
Texas |
599 | 9,484 | 919 |
Tillman |
176 | 1,392 | 795 |
Tulsa |
24,569 | 356,552 | 1,081 |
Wagoner |
858 | 9,318 | 936 |
Washington |
1,368 | 18,487 | 1,038 |
Washita |
280 | 1,983 | 844 |
Woods |
309 | 3,380 | 812 |
Woodward |
836 | 7,914 | 974 |
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data. |
|||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
State | Establishments, second quarter (thousands) |
Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 2022 (thousands) |
Percent change, June 2021–22 |
Second quarter 2022 |
National ranking by level |
Percent change, second quarter 2021–22 |
National ranking by percent change |
||
United States (2) |
11,460.8 | 149,902.0 | 4.0 | $1,294 | -- | 4.3 | -- |
Alabama |
147.8 | 2,007.0 | 2.1 | 1,069 | 37 | 6.2 | 16 |
Alaska |
24.4 | 329.5 | 4.4 | 1,237 | 17 | 4.7 | 36 |
Arizona |
199.8 | 2,962.1 | 3.3 | 1,220 | 21 | 5.8 | 22 |
Arkansas |
98.5 | 1,240.4 | 2.8 | 997 | 49 | 2.4 | 47 |
California |
1,706.1 | 17,915.3 | 5.6 | 1,572 | 4 | -0.6 | 51 |
Colorado |
242.3 | 2,838.5 | 4.1 | 1,361 | 9 | 6.2 | 16 |
Connecticut |
137.6 | 1,654.7 | 3.1 | 1,458 | 6 | 3.5 | 42 |
Delaware |
39.1 | 456.4 | 2.5 | 1,227 | 18 | 5.8 | 22 |
District of Columbia |
48.2 | 747.6 | 3.2 | 2,139 | 1 | 2.0 | 48 |
Florida |
858.7 | 9,126.7 | 5.0 | 1,186 | 22 | 6.5 | 10 |
Georgia |
369.2 | 4,669.6 | 4.9 | 1,221 | 20 | 7.2 | 5 |
Hawaii |
51.6 | 612.6 | 3.4 | 1,152 | 26 | 3.2 | 44 |
Idaho |
83.2 | 824.2 | 2.7 | 1,009 | 48 | 8.5 | 1 |
Illinois |
408.0 | 5,959.3 | 3.7 | 1,325 | 11 | 5.2 | 29 |
Indiana |
184.6 | 3,087.8 | 2.5 | 1,083 | 35 | 6.9 | 8 |
Iowa |
110.2 | 1,555.3 | 1.7 | 1,057 | 40 | 5.8 | 22 |
Kansas |
93.8 | 1,381.2 | 1.5 | 1,039 | 44 | 4.6 | 38 |
Kentucky |
140.9 | 1,886.9 | 1.8 | 1,070 | 36 | 7.1 | 7 |
Louisiana |
149.9 | 1,837.0 | 1.2 | 1,067 | 38 | 6.5 | 10 |
Maine |
61.6 | 637.6 | 1.9 | 1,086 | 34 | 8.0 | 3 |
Maryland |
184.9 | 2,640.3 | 1.5 | 1,378 | 8 | 4.6 | 38 |
Massachusetts |
288.5 | 3,654.3 | 4.3 | 1,637 | 2 | 2.8 | 46 |
Michigan |
289.6 | 4,326.6 | 3.7 | 1,183 | 23 | 3.5 | 42 |
Minnesota |
197.8 | 2,876.6 | 2.0 | 1,289 | 13 | 4.0 | 40 |
Mississippi |
79.5 | 1,136.6 | 2.4 | 887 | 51 | 5.3 | 28 |
Missouri |
231.6 | 2,852.0 | 3.3 | 1,106 | 32 | 5.1 | 32 |
Montana |
59.4 | 504.8 | 2.7 | 1,028 | 45 | 7.4 | 4 |
Nebraska |
79.9 | 988.5 | 1.2 | 1,060 | 39 | 6.3 | 13 |
Nevada |
106.9 | 1,462.4 | 7.8 | 1,163 | 24 | 5.2 | 29 |
New Hampshire |
62.4 | 671.9 | 2.0 | 1,349 | 10 | 0.4 | 50 |
New Jersey |
321.7 | 4,221.9 | 5.8 | 1,440 | 7 | 3.8 | 41 |
New Mexico |
69.6 | 822.4 | 3.6 | 1,040 | 43 | 5.5 | 25 |
New York |
672.2 | 9,341.5 | 5.1 | 1,587 | 3 | 3.1 | 45 |
North Carolina |
344.0 | 4,695.0 | 4.0 | 1,160 | 25 | 6.3 | 13 |
North Dakota |
33.9 | 416.9 | 2.3 | 1,131 | 30 | 6.0 | 19 |
Ohio |
322.7 | 5,404.1 | 2.6 | 1,127 | 31 | 5.4 | 26 |
Oklahoma |
121.9 | 1,610.4 | 2.5 | 1,016 | 46 | 5.4 | 26 |
Oregon |
176.7 | 1,956.6 | 2.7 | 1,253 | 15 | 4.8 | 35 |
Pennsylvania |
387.9 | 5,901.3 | 3.9 | 1,252 | 16 | 4.9 | 34 |
Rhode Island |
45.7 | 488.6 | 3.3 | 1,227 | 18 | 5.0 | 33 |
South Carolina |
162.7 | 2,170.7 | 3.5 | 1,043 | 42 | 6.8 | 9 |
South Dakota |
38.4 | 454.0 | 2.6 | 997 | 49 | 6.5 | 10 |
Tennessee |
201.0 | 3,151.9 | 4.7 | 1,152 | 26 | 5.2 | 29 |
Texas |
796.9 | 13,135.7 | 5.2 | 1,284 | 14 | 6.1 | 18 |
Utah |
130.3 | 1,644.0 | 3.7 | 1,137 | 28 | 7.2 | 5 |
Vermont |
29.9 | 297.7 | 1.2 | 1,135 | 29 | 8.1 | 2 |
Virginia |
320.6 | 3,949.1 | 2.4 | 1,316 | 12 | 4.7 | 36 |
Washington |
264.9 | 3,547.2 | 4.7 | 1,569 | 5 | 1.6 | 49 |
West Virginia |
56.5 | 672.1 | 1.2 | 1,013 | 47 | 6.0 | 19 |
Wisconsin |
197.9 | 2,897.0 | 1.6 | 1,097 | 33 | 5.9 | 21 |
Wyoming |
29.5 | 280.6 | 1.6 | 1,048 | 41 | 6.3 | 13 |
Puerto Rico |
49.2 | 910.1 | 4.8 | 597 | (3) | 5.3 | (3) |
Virgin Islands |
3.6 | 33.7 | -5.2 | 1,014 | (3) | 9.1 | (3) |
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data. |
|||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Last Modified Date: Friday, December 16, 2022