Department of Labor Logo United States Department of Labor
Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

News Release Information

22-2322-DAL
Friday, December 16, 2022

Contacts Technical information: Media contact:
  • (972) 850-4800

County Employment and Wages in Oklahoma – Second Quarter 2022

Employment rose in all three of the largest counties in Oklahoma from June 2021 to June 2022, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are those with annual average employment levels of 75,000 or more in 2021.) Regional Commissioner Michael Hirniak noted that Oklahoma County had the largest over-the-year increase in employment (+3.7 percent). (See chart 1 and table 1.)


National employment increased 4.0 percent over the year, with 338 of the 355 largest U.S. counties reporting gains. Orange, FL, had the largest over-the-year increase in employment with a gain of 9.7 percent. Kanawha, WV, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment with a loss of 1.0 percent.

Among the three largest counties in Oklahoma, employment was highest in Oklahoma County (468,200) in June 2022. Within Oklahoma County’s private industry, health care and social assistance accounted for the largest employment. Together, the three largest Oklahoma counties accounted for 56.6 percent of total employment within the state. Nationwide, the 355 largest counties made up 72.8 percent of total U.S. employment.

Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 74 counties in Oklahoma with employment below 75,000. Wage levels in all 74 smaller counties were below the national average of $1,294 in the second quarter of 2022. (See table 2.)

Large county wage changes

All three large Oklahoma counties reported average weekly wage gains from the second quarter of 2021 to the second quarter of 2022. (See chart 2.) Two counties had rates of wage gains at or above the national rate of 4.3 percent: Cleveland (+4.9 percent) and Oklahoma (+4.3 percent). Tulsa County’s reported rate of wage gain was 3.8 percent.


Among the 355 largest counties in the United States, 340 had over-the-year wage increases. Saratoga, NY, had the largest percentage wage increase (+16.3 percent). Benton, AR, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease (-16.1 percent).

Large county average weekly wages

Weekly wages in the three largest counties in Oklahoma were below the national average of $1,294 in the second quarter of 2022. Average weekly wages in Oklahoma County ($1,131) and Tulsa County ($1,081) ranked 201st and 236th, respectively, in the middle third of the large county national rankings. The average weekly wage for Cleveland County ($912) ranked 342nd among the 355 largest U.S. counties.

Among the largest U.S. counties, 91 reported average weekly wages above the U.S. average in the second quarter of 2022. Santa Clara, CA, had the highest average weekly wage at $3,262. Average weekly wages were at or below the national average in the remaining 264 counties. At $767 a week, Hidalgo, TX, had the lowest average weekly wage.

Average weekly wages in Oklahoma's smaller counties

All 74 smaller counties in Oklahoma—those with employment below 75,000—reported an average weekly wage below the national average. Dewey County reported the highest average weekly wage, $1,175. McIntosh County reported the lowest average wage in the state at $675 per week.

When all 77 counties in Oklahoma were considered, 20 reported average weekly wages of $799 or less, 25 registered wages from $800 to $899, 26 had wages from $900 to $999, and 6 had average weekly wages of $1,000 or higher. (See chart 3.) Most of the highest paying counties were in and around the Oklahoma City and Tulsa metropolitan areas.

Additional statistics and other information

QCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.

Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. This publication is typically published in September of the following year of the reference period or shortly after the QCEW first quarter full data update. The Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online is available at www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/.

The County Employment and Wages release for third quarter 2022 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, February 22, 2023.
The County Employment and Wages full data update for third quarter 2022 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, March 8, 2023.

Improved Usability of QCEW State and Local Government Employment and Wages

With the Second Quarter 2022 QCEW data released December 6th, 2022, state and local government employment and wage measures include data for some states that were previously suppressed for confidentiality reasons. Publication of these data is possible because state and local government employment and wages are fully disclosable by law in many states. The improved data account for an employment of about 4.2 million in June 2022. Suppressed data were always included in totals and do not represent an increase in employment.

More information is available on the website about the improved usability of state and local government data.


Technical Note

Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS web site at www.bls.gov/cew. However, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s web site.

QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.

The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.

Information in this release will be made available to individuals with sensory impairments upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Telecommunications Relay Service: 7-1-1.

Table 1. Covered establishments, employment, and wages in the United States and the three largest counties in Oklahoma, second quarter 2022
Area Establishments,
second quarter
(thousands)
Employment Average weekly wage (1)
June 2022
(thousands)
Percent change,
June
2021–22 (2)
National ranking
by percent change (3)
Second quarter
2022
National ranking
by level (3)
Percent change,
second quarter
2021–22 (2)
National ranking
by percent change (3)

United States (4)

11,460.8 149,902.0 4.0 -- $1,294 -- 4.3 --

Oklahoma

121.9 1,610.4 2.5 -- 1,016 46 5.4 26

Cleveland

6.7 86.5 0.4 333 912 342 4.9 156

Oklahoma

30.8 468.2 3.7 112 1,131 201 4.3 200

Tulsa

24.6 356.6 1.6 279 1,081 236 3.8 235

(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Percent changes were computed from employment and pay data adjusted for noneconomic county reclassifications.
(3) Ranking does not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(4) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.

Table 2. Covered establishments, employment, and wages in the United States and all counties in Oklahoma, second quarter 2022
Area Establishments Employment June 2022 Average weekly wage (1)

United States (2)

11,460,819 149,901,995 $1,294

Oklahoma

121,907 1,610,380 1,016

Adair

331 4,476 779

Alfalfa

150 1,259 913

Atoka

320 3,229 748

Beaver

170 1,250 854

Beckham

797 9,254 921

Blaine

300 2,936 858

Bryan

1,145 20,166 951

Caddo

616 7,024 906

Canadian

3,592 35,371 917

Carter

1,782 22,819 940

Cherokee

864 16,460 864

Choctaw

374 4,426 775

Cimarron

102 835 677

Cleveland

6,721 86,474 912

Coal

122 1,110 752

Comanche

2,523 40,200 903

Cotton

112 1,584 838

Craig

423 5,054 802

Creek

1,649 19,405 973

Custer

996 12,018 864

Delaware

890 9,930 766

Dewey

201 1,862 1,175

Ellis

137 1,072 838

Garfield

1,741 23,134 941

Garvin

826 9,809 1,004

Grady

1,210 12,008 874

Grant

168 1,332 982

Greer

108 828 746

Harmon

76 637 745

Harper

145 1,004 787

Haskell

257 3,273 750

Hughes

282 2,700 740

Jackson

655 9,267 944

Jefferson

142 1,006 699

Johnston

249 2,719 849

Kay

1,230 17,418 889

Kingfisher

590 6,587 1,012

Kiowa

237 1,909 796

Latimer

222 2,423 822

LeFlore

1,002 11,886 865

Lincoln

712 6,865 903

Logan

834 8,012 817

Love

239 5,185 833

McClain

1,164 10,313 828

McCurtain

811 12,190 806

McIntosh

406 4,262 675

Major

258 2,150 807

Marshall

316 4,913 972

Mayes

972 12,892 975

Murray

371 5,416 794

Muskogee

1,554 28,535 942

Noble

261 4,784 910

Nowata

175 1,888 909

Okfuskee

224 2,261 740

Oklahoma

30,786 468,177 1,131

Okmulgee

793 9,279 875

Osage

561 6,769 882

Ottawa

762 12,866 791

Pawnee

322 3,165 838

Payne

2,159 32,818 907

Pittsburg

1,039 14,705 959

Pontotoc

1,173 19,142 942

Pottawatomie

1,424 22,281 840

Pushmataha

278 2,321 786

Roger Mills

106 818 884

Rogers

2,079 26,118 994

Seminole

528 6,607 863

Sequoyah

733 9,446 681

Stephens

1,142 14,842 921

Texas

599 9,484 919

Tillman

176 1,392 795

Tulsa

24,569 356,552 1,081

Wagoner

858 9,318 936

Washington

1,368 18,487 1,038

Washita

280 1,983 844

Woods

309 3,380 812

Woodward

836 7,914 974

(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.

Table 3. Covered establishments, employment, and wages by state, second quarter 2022
State Establishments,
second quarter
(thousands)
Employment Average weekly wage (1)
June 2022
(thousands)
Percent change,
June
2021–22
Second quarter
2022
National ranking
by level
Percent change,
second quarter
2021–22
National ranking
by percent change

United States (2)

11,460.8 149,902.0 4.0 $1,294 -- 4.3 --

Alabama

147.8 2,007.0 2.1 1,069 37 6.2 16

Alaska

24.4 329.5 4.4 1,237 17 4.7 36

Arizona

199.8 2,962.1 3.3 1,220 21 5.8 22

Arkansas

98.5 1,240.4 2.8 997 49 2.4 47

California

1,706.1 17,915.3 5.6 1,572 4 -0.6 51

Colorado

242.3 2,838.5 4.1 1,361 9 6.2 16

Connecticut

137.6 1,654.7 3.1 1,458 6 3.5 42

Delaware

39.1 456.4 2.5 1,227 18 5.8 22

District of Columbia

48.2 747.6 3.2 2,139 1 2.0 48

Florida

858.7 9,126.7 5.0 1,186 22 6.5 10

Georgia

369.2 4,669.6 4.9 1,221 20 7.2 5

Hawaii

51.6 612.6 3.4 1,152 26 3.2 44

Idaho

83.2 824.2 2.7 1,009 48 8.5 1

Illinois

408.0 5,959.3 3.7 1,325 11 5.2 29

Indiana

184.6 3,087.8 2.5 1,083 35 6.9 8

Iowa

110.2 1,555.3 1.7 1,057 40 5.8 22

Kansas

93.8 1,381.2 1.5 1,039 44 4.6 38

Kentucky

140.9 1,886.9 1.8 1,070 36 7.1 7

Louisiana

149.9 1,837.0 1.2 1,067 38 6.5 10

Maine

61.6 637.6 1.9 1,086 34 8.0 3

Maryland

184.9 2,640.3 1.5 1,378 8 4.6 38

Massachusetts

288.5 3,654.3 4.3 1,637 2 2.8 46

Michigan

289.6 4,326.6 3.7 1,183 23 3.5 42

Minnesota

197.8 2,876.6 2.0 1,289 13 4.0 40

Mississippi

79.5 1,136.6 2.4 887 51 5.3 28

Missouri

231.6 2,852.0 3.3 1,106 32 5.1 32

Montana

59.4 504.8 2.7 1,028 45 7.4 4

Nebraska

79.9 988.5 1.2 1,060 39 6.3 13

Nevada

106.9 1,462.4 7.8 1,163 24 5.2 29

New Hampshire

62.4 671.9 2.0 1,349 10 0.4 50

New Jersey

321.7 4,221.9 5.8 1,440 7 3.8 41

New Mexico

69.6 822.4 3.6 1,040 43 5.5 25

New York

672.2 9,341.5 5.1 1,587 3 3.1 45

North Carolina

344.0 4,695.0 4.0 1,160 25 6.3 13

North Dakota

33.9 416.9 2.3 1,131 30 6.0 19

Ohio

322.7 5,404.1 2.6 1,127 31 5.4 26

Oklahoma

121.9 1,610.4 2.5 1,016 46 5.4 26

Oregon

176.7 1,956.6 2.7 1,253 15 4.8 35

Pennsylvania

387.9 5,901.3 3.9 1,252 16 4.9 34

Rhode Island

45.7 488.6 3.3 1,227 18 5.0 33

South Carolina

162.7 2,170.7 3.5 1,043 42 6.8 9

South Dakota

38.4 454.0 2.6 997 49 6.5 10

Tennessee

201.0 3,151.9 4.7 1,152 26 5.2 29

Texas

796.9 13,135.7 5.2 1,284 14 6.1 18

Utah

130.3 1,644.0 3.7 1,137 28 7.2 5

Vermont

29.9 297.7 1.2 1,135 29 8.1 2

Virginia

320.6 3,949.1 2.4 1,316 12 4.7 36

Washington

264.9 3,547.2 4.7 1,569 5 1.6 49

West Virginia

56.5 672.1 1.2 1,013 47 6.0 19

Wisconsin

197.9 2,897.0 1.6 1,097 33 5.9 21

Wyoming

29.5 280.6 1.6 1,048 41 6.3 13

Puerto Rico

49.2 910.1 4.8 597 (3) 5.3 (3)

Virgin Islands

3.6 33.7 -5.2 1,014 (3) 9.1 (3)

(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(3) Data not included in the national ranking.

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.

 

Last Modified Date: Friday, December 16, 2022