Consumer units (households) in the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont metropolitan area spent an average of $73,601 per year in 2011-2012, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Regional Commissioner Richard J. Holden noted that this figure was over 45 percent higher than the $50,581 average expenditure level for a typical household in the United States. Not only did households in the San Francisco area spend more than the U.S. average, but they also allocated their dollars differently in 6 of the 8 eight largest expenditure categories. For example, expenditures for healthcare accounted for 5.7 percent of a typical household budget in the San Francisco area, significantly below the nationwide average of 6.8 percent. (See chart 1 and table 1.)

Housing in the San Francisco metropolitan area averaged $25,900 annually and was the largest expenditure category, accounting for 35.2 percent of a San Francisco area household’s total budget. This share was significantly larger than the 33.3-percent national average. (See tables 1 and 2.) Overall, 8 of the 18 published metropolitan areas had expenditure shares for housing measurably above the U.S. average, while 3 had significantly lower-than-average shares. (See chart 2.) Among the 18 areas, housing shares ranged from 39.7 percent in New York to 31.7 percent in Detroit. (See table 3.)

The majority of total housing expenditures in San Francisco, 68.6 percent, went toward shelter, which includes mortgage interest, property taxes, repairs, and rent, among other items; nationwide, 58.5 percent of the housing budget was allocated for shelter. (See table A.) Utilities, fuels, and public services expenses accounted for 13.0 percent of the housing budget locally; nationally, it made up 21.9 percent. The rate of homeownership in San Francisco, at 52 percent, was less than the U.S. average of 65 percent.

Table A. Percent distribution of housing expenditures, United States and San Francisco, 2011–2012

Category	United States	San Francisco
Total Housing	100.0	100.0
Shelter	58.5	68.6
Utilities, fuels and public services	21.9	13.0
Household operation	6.8	9.3
Housekeeping supplies	3.6	2.3
Household furnishings and equipment	9.2	6.7
Note: Columns may not add to 100 due to rounding.

At 14.2 percent of the total budget, transportation was the second-largest expenditure category in the San Francisco area, significantly lower than the national average of 17.1 percent. Among the 18 published areas nationwide, 8 had transportation shares that were significantly below the national average; only one had a share that was significantly above the average. (See chart 3.)

Of the $10,466 in annual expenditures for transportation in San Francisco, 87.8 percent was spent buying and maintaining private vehicles compared to the national average of 93.9 percent. The remaining 12.2 percent of a San Francisco household’s transportation budget was spent on public transit–which includes fares for taxis, buses, trains, and planes–and was above the 6.1-percent average for the nation. (See table B.) The average number of vehicles per household in San Francisco was 1.9, compared to the national average of 1.9.

Table B. Percent distribution of transportation expenditures, United States and San Francisco, 2011–2012

Category	United States	San Francisco
Total Transportation	100.0	100.0
Vehicle purchases (net outlay)	34.0	29.6
Gasoline and motor oil	31.3	24.4
Other vehicle expenses	28.6	33.8
Public transportation	6.1	12.2
Note: Columns may not add to 100 due to rounding.

San Francisco households spent 14.0 percent of their annual budgets on personal insurance and pensions, significantly above the national average of 10.9 percent, making this the third-largest expenditure category for the area’s consumer units.

The portion of the average San Francisco consumer unit’s budget spent on food, 11.5 percent, was significantly smaller than the 12.9-percent U.S. average. Among the 18 metropolitan areas, 14 had food expenditure shares that were not measurably different from the nationwide average. In the four remaining areas, three had food shares significantly below the national average, while one was significantly above average.

Households in San Francisco spent 53.7 percent ($4,525), of their food dollars on food prepared at home and the remaining 46.3 percent on food prepared away from home, such as restaurant meals, carry-out, board at school, and catered affairs. In comparison, the typical U.S. household spent 59.4 percent of its food budget on food prepared at home and 40.6 percent on food prepared away from home.

As noted, San Francisco is 1 of 18 metropolitan areas nationwide for which Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE) data are available. Metropolitan area CE data and that for the four geographic regions and the United States are available on our website at www.bls.gov/cex/tables.htm. Metropolitan area CE news releases are available at www.bls.gov/regions/subjects/consumer-spending.htm .

Additional information

Data contained in this report are from the CE, which is collected on an ongoing basis by the U.S. Census Bureau for the BLS. The CE data were averaged over a two-year period, 2011 and 2012 and are available for the nation, the 4 geographic regions of the country, and 18 metropolitan areas. The metropolitan area discussed in this release is San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, California, which is comprised of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco, and San Mateo Counties.

The survey consists of two components, a diary or recordkeeping survey, and an interview survey. The integrated data from the BLS Diary and Interview Surveys provide a complete accounting of consumer expenditures and income, which neither survey component alone is designed to do. Due to changes in the survey sample frame, metropolitan area data in this release are not directly comparable to those prior to 1996.

A consumer unit is defined as members of a household related by blood, marriage, adoption, or other legal arrangement; a single person living alone or sharing a household with others but who is financially independent; or two or more persons living together who share responsibility for at least 2 out of 3 major types of expenses – food, housing, and other expenses. The terms household or consumer unit are used interchangeably for convenience.

CE metropolitan area estimates are not comparative cost of living surveys, as neither the quantity nor the quality of goods and services has been held constant among areas. Differences may result from variations in demographic characteristics such as consumer unit size, age, preferences, income levels, etc. However, expenditure shares, or the percentage of a consumer unit’s budget spent on a particular category, can be used to compare spending patterns across areas. Sample sizes for the metropolitan areas are much smaller than for the nation, so the U.S. estimates and year-to-year changes are more reliable than those for the metropolitan areas. Users should also keep in mind that prices for many goods and services have changed since the survey was conducted.

Expenditure shares for housing and transportation that are above or below that for the nation after testing for significance at the 95-percent confidence interval are also identified in charts 2 and 3 for the 18 metropolitan areas surveyed.

A value that is statistically different from another does not necessarily mean that the difference has economic or practical significance. Statistical significance is concerned with our ability to make confident statements about a universe based on a sample. It is entirely possible that a large difference between two values is not significantly different statistically, while a small difference is, since both the size and heterogeneity of the sample affect the relative error of the data being tested.

For additional technical and related information, see www.bls.gov/opub/hom/cex/home.htm.

Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; Federal Relay Service: 800-877-8339.

Table 1. Percent distribution of average annual expenditures, United States and San Francisco, Consumer Expenditure Survey,
2011–2012

Category	United States	San Francisco
Average annual expenditures	$50,581	$73,601
Percent distribution:	100.0	100.0
Food	12.9	11.5*
Alcoholic beverages	0.9	1.0
Housing	33.3	35.2*
Apparel and services	3.4	3.2
Transportation	17.1	14.2*
Healthcare	6.8	5.7*
Entertainment	5.1	4.6*
Personal care products and services	1.2	1.1
Reading	0.2	0.3*
Education	2.2	2.7
Tobacco products and smoking supplies	0.7	0.3*
Miscellaneous	1.6	2.1
Cash contributions	3.6	4.2
Personal insurance and pensions	10.9	14.0*
*Statistically significant difference from the U.S. average at the 95-percent confidence level.   Note: Columns may not add to 100 due to rounding.

 

Table 2. Average annual expenditures and characteristics, United States and San Francisco, Consumer Expenditure Survey,
2011–2012

Category	United States	San Francisco
Consumer unit characteristics:
Income before taxes	$64,649	$98,242
Age of reference person	49.9	48.9
Average number in consumer unit:
Persons	2.5	2.4
Children under 18	0.6	0.5
Persons 65 and over	0.3	0.3
Earners	1.3	1.3
Vehicles	1.9	1.9
Percent homeowner	65	52
Average annual expenditures:
Average annual expenditures	$50,581	$73,601
Food	6,529	8,433
Food at home	3,880	4,525
Cereals and bakery products	534	562
Meats, poultry, fish, and eggs	843	1,013
Dairy products	413	437
Fruits and vegetables	723	1,008
Other food at home	1,367	1,506
Food away from home	2,649	3,908
Alcoholic beverages	454	705
Housing	16,846	25,900
Shelter	9,858	17,773
Owned dwellings	6,101	9,551
Rented dwellings	3,109	6,884
Other lodging	648	1,338
Utilities, fuels, and public services	3,687	3,374
Household operations	1,141	2,413
Housekeeping supplies	612	600
Household furnishings and equipment	1,547	1,741
Apparel and services	1,738	2,379
Transportation	8,649	10,466
Vehicle purchases (net outlay)	2,942	3,098
Gasoline and motor oil	2,706	2,550
Other vehicle expenses	2,472	3,537
Public transportation	529	1,282
Healthcare	3,436	4,186
Entertainment	2,589	3,384
Personal care products and services	631	827
Reading	112	198
Education	1,130	1,961
Tobacco products and smoking supplies	341	208
Miscellaneous	802	1,519
Cash contributions	1,818	3,118
Personal insurance and pensions	5,508	10,316
Life and other personal insurance	335	397
Pensions and Social Security	5,173	9,919

Table 3. Percent share of average annual expenditures for housing, transportation, and food, United States and 18 metropolitan areas, Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2011-2012

Area	Housing	Transportation	Food
United States	33.3	17.1	12.9
Atlanta	34.7	16.9	11.7*
Baltimore	33.8	13.7*	12.7
Boston	31.8*	14.8*	13.2
Chicago	34.9*	15.0*	12.3
Cleveland	31.9	17.8	12.3
Dallas	32.9	18.6	12.5
Detroit	31.7*	18.8	13.3
Houston	31.9	20.3*	12.5
Los Angeles	37.7*	16.0*	13.6*
Miami	38.4*	17.0	13.7
Minneapolis	31.8*	17.5	12.6
New York	39.7*	13.7*	12.4
Philadelphia	37.9*	14.4*	12.7
Phoenix	34.8	15.9	13.0
San Diego	38.5*	15.6	12.0
San Francisco	35.2*	14.2*	11.5*
Seattle	34.1	15.7	12.8
Washington	35.3*	15.0*	11.6*
* Statistically significant difference from the U.S. average at the 95-percent confidence level.