An official website of the United States government
21-918-SAN
Tuesday, May 18, 2021
Employment decreased in Washington’s 10 large counties from September 2019 to September 2020, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are those with annual average employment levels of 75,000 or more in 2019.) Regional Commissioner Chris Rosenlund noted that employment decreases ranged from 7.6 percent in Snohomish and Whatcom Counties to 5.4 percent in Yakima County. (See chart 1 and table 1.)
National employment decreased 6.8 percent over the year, with 355 of the 357 largest U.S. counties reporting declines. Maui + Kalawao, HI, had the largest over-the-year decrease in employment with a loss of 35.4 percent. Utah, UT, experienced the largest over-the-year percentage increase in employment with a gain of 1.9 percent.
Among the 10 largest counties in Washington, employment was highest in King County (1,340,000) in September 2020. Pierce and Snohomish Counties had employment levels of 300,200 and 271,500, respectively. Together, the 10 largest Washington counties accounted for 85.1 percent of total employment within the state. Nationwide, the 357 largest counties made up 72.9 percent of total U.S. employment.
Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 29 counties in Washington with employment below 75,000. Wage levels in all 29 smaller counties were below the national average in the third quarter of 2020. (See table 2.)
Large county wage changesThe 10 large Washington counties reported average weekly wage gains from the third quarter of 2019 to the third quarter of 2020. (See chart 2.) Four counties had rates of wage gains above the national rate of 7.4 percent. King County had the largest gain (+14.3 percent), followed by Kitsap County (+9.8 percent), Clark County (+8.5 percent), and Whatcom County (+7.9 percent). Over-the-year wage gains among Washington’s other six large counties ranged from 7.2 percent to 6.2 percent.
Among the 357 largest counties in the United States, 350 had over-the-year wage increases. Nationally, the increases in average weekly wages largely reflect substantial employment loss among lower-paid industries. Employment declines occurring in some higher-paid industries also feature significant wage increases. San Mateo, CA, had the largest percentage wage increase (+23.2 percent). Seven large counties had wage declines during the period. Ector, TX, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease (-11.0 percent).
Large county average weekly wagesAverage weekly wages in three of Washington’s large counties placed in the top third of the national ranking. King County ($2,077, 5th), Snohomish County ($1,243, 73rd), and Benton County ($1,175, 95th) had weekly wages that exceeded the national average of $1,173 in the third quarter of 2020. Yakima County ($843, 341st) had the lowest average weekly wage among the state’s large counties and placed in the bottom third of the largest U.S. counties.
Among the largest U.S. counties, 96 reported average weekly wages above the U.S. average in the third quarter of 2020. San Mateo, CA, had the highest average weekly wage at $2,922. Average weekly wages were at or below the national average in 261 counties. At $697 a week, Cameron, TX, had the lowest average weekly wage.
Average weekly wages in Washington’s smaller countiesAll 29 counties in Washington with employment below 75,000 had average weekly wages lower than the national average of $1,173. Among these counties, Cowlitz County had the highest average weekly wage at $1,086. Wahkiakum County reported the lowest weekly wage among all counties in the state, averaging $711 in the third quarter of 2020.
When all 39 counties in Washington were considered, 2 had wages below $800. Fifteen counties had average weekly wages ranging from $800 to $899, 8 had wages from $900 to $999, and 14 had wages at or above $1,000. (See chart 3.)
Additional statistics and other informationQCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.
Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2019 edition of this publication was published in September 2020. Tables and additional content from the 2019 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online are available at www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/2019/home.htm. The 2020 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available in September 2021.
The County Employment and Wages release for fourth quarter 2020 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, May 19, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. (ET). The County Employment and Wages full data update for fourth quarter 2020 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. (ET) .
In the spring of 2020, BLS modified its imputation process for QCEW to be more responsive to current economic conditions. While continuing work to improve this process, BLS made an unintended data processing error. This error affected data for the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2020. BLS has analyzed this issue and has determined that the impact on QCEW employment was negligible at the statewide level. In smaller areas and industries revisions may be larger than usual. Wage data were not affected. Following the usual QCEW practice these data will be revised and corrected with the full data update on September 1, 2021.
For more information on QCEW imputation methodology, see www.bls.gov/cew/additional-resources/imputation-methodology.htm.
Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS web site at www.bls.gov/cew. However, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s web site.
QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.
The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.
Information in this release will be made available to individuals with sensory impairments upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.
Area | Establishments, third quarter 2020 (thousands) | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
September 2020 (thousands) | Percent change, September 2019–20 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | Third quarter 2020 | National ranking by level (3) | Percent change, third quarter 2019–20 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | ||
United States (4) | 10,561.3 | 138,549.5 | -6.8 | -- | $1,173 | -- | 7.4 | -- |
Washington | 256.6 | 3,266.2 | -6.3 | -- | 1,482 | 3 | 11.0 | 2 |
Benton | 6.2 | 88.6 | -5.6 | 127 | 1,175 | 95 | 6.3 | 233 |
Clark | 16.1 | 156.1 | -5.7 | 136 | 1,148 | 112 | 8.5 | 95 |
King | 91.7 | 1,340.0 | -6.9 | 200 | 2,077 | 5 | 14.3 | 11 |
Kitsap | 7.1 | 87.1 | -5.6 | 127 | 1,117 | 134 | 9.8 | 49 |
Pierce | 24.1 | 300.2 | -6.4 | 178 | 1,114 | 141 | 7.1 | 181 |
Snohomish | 22.4 | 271.5 | -7.6 | 220 | 1,243 | 73 | 6.2 | 240 |
Spokane | 17.2 | 218.1 | -6.2 | 169 | 1,018 | 208 | 7.0 | 190 |
Thurston | 8.9 | 113.2 | -5.6 | 127 | 1,117 | 134 | 7.2 | 175 |
Whatcom | 7.6 | 84.5 | -7.6 | 220 | 1,007 | 221 | 7.9 | 131 |
Yakima | 8.2 | 119.7 | -5.4 | 120 | 843 | 341 | 6.4 | 227 |
Footnotes: | ||||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Area | Employment September 2020 | Average Weekly Wage(1) |
---|---|---|
United States(2) | 138,549,503 | $1,173 |
Washington | 3,266,168 | 1,482 |
Adams | 9,224 | 848 |
Asotin | 6,482 | 817 |
Benton | 88,640 | 1,175 |
Chelan | 43,097 | 867 |
Clallam | 22,871 | 890 |
Clark | 156,076 | 1,148 |
Columbia | 1,396 | 966 |
Cowlitz | 38,634 | 1,086 |
Douglas | 12,766 | 814 |
Ferry | 1,736 | 864 |
Franklin | 34,821 | 913 |
Garfield | 678 | 1,046 |
Grant | 41,885 | 945 |
Grays Harbor | 21,859 | 912 |
Island | 16,134 | 896 |
Jefferson | 9,005 | 846 |
King | 1,340,019 | 2,077 |
Kitsap | 87,081 | 1,117 |
Kittitas | 15,076 | 880 |
Klickitat | 7,038 | 1,028 |
Lewis | 26,391 | 922 |
Lincoln | 2,866 | 828 |
Mason | 13,798 | 903 |
Okanogan | 17,299 | 776 |
Pacific | 6,252 | 807 |
Pend Oreille | 2,791 | 914 |
Pierce | 300,194 | 1,114 |
San Juan | 5,633 | 838 |
Skagit | 49,546 | 1,037 |
Skamania | 1,944 | 831 |
Snohomish | 271,526 | 1,243 |
Spokane | 218,081 | 1,018 |
Stevens | 10,885 | 837 |
Thurston | 113,222 | 1,117 |
Wahkiakum | 844 | 711 |
Walla Walla | 28,517 | 922 |
Whatcom | 84,474 | 1,007 |
Whitman | 17,597 | 1,040 |
Yakima | 119,714 | 843 |
Footnotes | ||
NOTE: Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. Data are preliminary. |
State | Establishments, third quarter 2020 (thousands) | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
September 2020 (thousands) | Percent change, September 2019–20 | Third quarter 2020 | National ranking by level | Percent change, third quarter 2019–20 | National ranking by percent change | ||
United States (2) | 10,561.3 | 138,549.5 | -6.8 | $1,173 | -- | 7.4 | -- |
Alabama | 132.2 | 1,902.4 | -4.5 | 978 | 33 | 6.4 | 27 |
Alaska | 22.9 | 302.6 | -10.7 | 1,165 | 14 | 5.4 | 42 |
Arizona | 174.1 | 2,797.1 | -4.2 | 1,091 | 22 | 7.3 | 17 |
Arkansas | 93.6 | 1,180.1 | -3.4 | 892 | 49 | 6.1 | 31 |
California | 1,643.8 | 16,096.8 | -9.2 | 1,466 | 4 | 12.0 | 1 |
Colorado | 220.1 | 2,597.2 | -5.6 | 1,235 | 9 | 5.6 | 38 |
Connecticut | 125.4 | 1,555.6 | -7.3 | 1,328 | 7 | 7.4 | 15 |
Delaware | 34.9 | 428.8 | -5.6 | 1,150 | 15 | 6.8 | 21 |
District of Columbia | 43.3 | 713.7 | -8.1 | 1,962 | 1 | 6.1 | 31 |
Florida | 749.1 | 8,329.7 | -5.8 | 1,029 | 27 | 8.0 | 11 |
Georgia | 313.0 | 4,282.1 | -5.2 | 1,084 | 23 | 5.8 | 35 |
Hawaii | 46.5 | 507.5 | -22.9 | 1,114 | 18 | 10.3 | 4 |
Idaho | 70.7 | 763.7 | -0.2 | 884 | 50 | 5.5 | 41 |
Illinois | 385.9 | 5,558.5 | -7.8 | 1,199 | 11 | 6.8 | 21 |
Indiana | 172.4 | 2,941.8 | -4.7 | 961 | 39 | 5.3 | 43 |
Iowa | 105.1 | 1,475.0 | -5.2 | 969 | 36 | 6.0 | 34 |
Kansas | 89.2 | 1,325.4 | -5.0 | 952 | 40 | 6.6 | 24 |
Kentucky | 128.0 | 1,807.1 | -5.5 | 935 | 43 | 5.8 | 35 |
Louisiana | 139.5 | 1,734.6 | -9.6 | 970 | 35 | 5.2 | 45 |
Maine | 54.4 | 597.3 | -5.9 | 966 | 37 | 9.0 | 9 |
Maryland | 172.4 | 2,496.6 | -7.6 | 1,277 | 8 | 9.5 | 7 |
Massachusetts | 265.1 | 3,314.8 | -9.4 | 1,488 | 2 | 9.7 | 6 |
Michigan | 266.9 | 4,035.9 | -7.9 | 1,096 | 20 | 7.5 | 14 |
Minnesota | 183.1 | 2,703.3 | -7.4 | 1,178 | 12 | 6.4 | 27 |
Mississippi | 74.9 | 1,092.4 | -4.0 | 810 | 51 | 5.6 | 38 |
Missouri | 218.8 | 2,681.7 | -5.1 | 995 | 32 | 5.6 | 38 |
Montana | 53.0 | 466.9 | -2.5 | 904 | 48 | 6.6 | 24 |
Nebraska | 73.7 | 949.9 | -3.8 | 964 | 38 | 6.4 | 27 |
Nevada | 87.9 | 1,251.0 | -11.6 | 1,048 | 24 | 7.8 | 13 |
New Hampshire | 56.1 | 634.2 | -5.2 | 1,171 | 13 | 8.9 | 10 |
New Jersey | 289.3 | 3,778.4 | -8.0 | 1,331 | 6 | 9.5 | 7 |
New Mexico | 63.1 | 771.9 | -8.6 | 944 | 41 | 5.1 | 46 |
New York | 657.6 | 8,547.7 | -10.8 | 1,446 | 5 | 10.0 | 5 |
North Carolina | 301.4 | 4,308.2 | -4.4 | 1,039 | 26 | 6.9 | 20 |
North Dakota | 32.5 | 398.2 | -7.0 | 1,025 | 28 | -0.3 | 50 |
Ohio | 305.7 | 5,136.8 | -5.6 | 1,040 | 25 | 6.6 | 24 |
Oklahoma | 112.4 | 1,538.5 | -5.7 | 917 | 46 | 2.3 | 48 |
Oregon | 164.6 | 1,837.3 | -7.0 | 1,113 | 19 | 7.4 | 15 |
Pennsylvania | 366.5 | 5,501.0 | -7.6 | 1,139 | 17 | 7.0 | 19 |
Rhode Island | 40.1 | 452.5 | -8.0 | 1,092 | 21 | 10.4 | 3 |
South Carolina | 146.6 | 2,022.9 | -5.2 | 924 | 44 | 6.7 | 23 |
South Dakota | 35.2 | 422.3 | -2.6 | 918 | 45 | 7.2 | 18 |
Tennessee | 173.6 | 2,918.1 | -4.6 | 1,022 | 29 | 5.8 | 35 |
Texas | 733.1 | 11,926.8 | -5.5 | 1,150 | 15 | 3.8 | 47 |
Utah | 114.3 | 1,518.2 | -1.0 | 1,015 | 30 | 6.1 | 31 |
Vermont | 26.4 | 283.9 | -8.6 | 1,001 | 31 | 7.9 | 12 |
Virginia | 285.7 | 3,737.0 | -5.0 | 1,201 | 10 | 6.4 | 27 |
Washington | 256.6 | 3,266.2 | -6.3 | 1,482 | 3 | 11.0 | 2 |
West Virginia | 51.7 | 649.1 | -6.7 | 913 | 47 | 1.8 | 49 |
Wisconsin | 181.2 | 2,746.6 | -5.2 | 977 | 34 | 5.3 | 43 |
Wyoming | 27.5 | 264.0 | -6.8 | 939 | 42 | -0.4 | 51 |
Puerto Rico | 45.7 | 831.6 | -5.3 | 547 | (3) | 3.4 | (3) |
Virgin Islands | 3.4 | 33.9 | -13.0 | 1,019 | (3) | -0.5 | (3) |
Footnotes: | |||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Last Modified Date: Tuesday, May 18, 2021